The Active Economy of Papua New Guinea (PNG)
In response to the Central Bank's statement on Tuesday's National News Paper about "Economy Active" in terms of the six points mentioned. In fact, Economy is Active as a result of surplus national budget of PNG in the recent years due to minerals boom. The minerals boom has resulted in a greatly increased flow of revenue into PNG Treasury Account.
Emergent canopy tree fall for timber in the Gulf Province, Papua New Guinea
There is some (small) buy-down of debt proposed in the 2007 Budget. However, does the PNG government buffering itself sufficiently for the inevitable drop in minerals prices in the near to middle term? The wisdom of running a small deficit during a minerals boom seems doubtful indeed.
A further worrying sign is the increase in recurrent expenditure. Recurrent expenditure is budgeted to increase from K3, 447.6 million in 2006 to K3, 824.6 in 2007-an 11% increase. Likewise, wage bill portion of recurrent expenditure is rise from K1, 265. 8 million in 2006 to K1, 404.2 million in 2007-also an 11% increase to compensate for the price increase at the same rate. Now that due to the inflation government has increased the minimum wage rate.
The wage bill portion of recurrent expenditure is politically difficult to cut in PNG. These rapid increases in the public sector wage bill will leave future government in a difficult situation when revenues fall. If mineral revenues fall during the term of the next government, it will find itself in the same position in which previous governments found themselves.
High level of politically untouchable recurrent expenditures and falling tax revenues meant that the only recourse was to substantially increase public debt. Apparently government is panicking about the next year’s budgets and onwards because it realised that the budgets will not be backed up by any windfall gains.
It is really unpredictable for one to say ‘we are rich enough just because we have the mineral resources’ without taking other factors that affects the revenue into consideration like exchange rate volatility, aggregate demand, world financial crisis, etc...
Therefore, what is the BPNG's advise to the Government and what are the current government’s effective plans to cater for this? Or government wants to use up all the reserves and leave the country suffering in silence for the years to come?
PNG, this is the real situation we are facing now but we are being brain washed in media reports. We will face this problem sooner than later, what is your say on this?
Mathew KAKARAYA,
Nanjing, CHINA.
Economy of Papua New Guinea (Facts)
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Labels: Editorial Letters
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home