Border issues are crucial to Papua New Guinea

BY GELAB PIAK*

The Papua New Guinea-Indonesia border has always been a contentious issue between the two countries. There was a time in the 1970s and early 1980s when suspicion was so high on both sides that there was a very real fear in PNG of high levels of invasion by Indonesian Forces across the border.

The PNG Defence Force drilled in jungle warfare tactics, mostly to hold off the superior numbers of Indonesian troops in the jungles of PNG. At the time the West Papua freedom fighters, the OPM, took advantage of the suspicion and mistrust between the two countries to carry out its rebel activities into PNG territory, further driving a wedge between the two neighbours.

West Papuans crossed as refugees into PNG in droves, heightening diplomatic and security tensions.Then in 1987, at the instigation of PNG, the two countries signed the Treaty of Mutual Friendship, Goodwill and Respect. Cross-border dialogue improved and increased in frequency.

Today, Waigani and Jakarta share a very cordial relationship with embassies in each capital and consulates in Vanimo and Jayapura. But the no-man’s land between the two countries remains the same 1,600km stretch of hostile virgin jungle. There is no indication as to where the border mark is except cement markers planted every 75km or so in the jungle.

In thick jungle, most of these markers are overgrown with bushes and are no longer visible. OPM freedom fighters still carry out their daring hit and run war against members of the Indonesian armed forces up and down this unmarked, jungle-covered border.

Uniformed Indonesian soldiers continue to cross the border in hot pursuit and often mistake Papua New Guinean citizens for West Papuan OPM activists as happened last month in a border village called Skotso in Sandaun province.

Amid all this, the PNG Government sits hapless, almost disinterested and even if it were interested, it is apparently helpless. To this, PNG must now face two new realities which might in time become threats if they are not already so. All along this border, the Indonesian government seems to have a decided policy to build infrastructure and improve government services to the area.

This is forcing Papua New Guinean citizens, who naturally have relations across the border, to cross into Indonesian towns looking for jobs, for medical treatment and in search of education. The boy who was shot last month was actually attending school in Indonesia and was returning home to Skotso when the shooting incident happened.

Despite the incident, relatives ferried the boy back across the border to get medical treatment in Jayapura, reinforcing the idea that whatever the threat, PNG’s border people seek services on the other side. The second problem that appears to be happening is illegal border crossers. Forest Minister Belden Namah said last week that Asians were crossing illegally into PNG.“They do not need to come in containers any more.

They just breathe fresh air and cross the border into PNG in broad daylight,” Mr Namah said.The Papua New Guinea response to this is next to nothing.There is nil development of any kind all along the PNG side of the border.

The PNG Defence Force detachment and police border commands in both Western and Sandaun lack vehicular support, communications and other logistics. The Sandaun police are understaffed by half their required ceiling and have withdrawn all personal from little sub-districts all along the border from Amanab and Green River to Telefomin.

“It is a very difficult situation when you call and call and it falls on deaf ears,” Mr Namah said in relation to his attempts to get the Government to improve border security and surveillance and to increase funding for infrastructure and economic projects along the border. The new Border Development Authority ought to be authorised to use its funds to increase surveillance and to establish agro-forestry projects in Sandaun and Western provinces.

Piak is a student of the Divine Word University in Madang, Papua New Guinea*

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Border issues are crucial to Papua New Guinea

BY GELAB PIAK*

The Papua New Guinea-Indonesia border has always been a contentious issue between the two countries. There was a time in the 1970s and early 1980s when suspicion was so high on both sides that there was a very real fear in PNG of high levels of invasion by Indonesian Forces across the border.

The PNG Defence Force drilled in jungle warfare tactics, mostly to hold off the superior numbers of Indonesian troops in the jungles of PNG. At the time the West Papua freedom fighters, the OPM, took advantage of the suspicion and mistrust between the two countries to carry out its rebel activities into PNG territory, further driving a wedge between the two neighbours.

West Papuans crossed as refugees into PNG in droves, heightening diplomatic and security tensions.Then in 1987, at the instigation of PNG, the two countries signed the Treaty of Mutual Friendship, Goodwill and Respect. Cross-border dialogue improved and increased in frequency.

Today, Waigani and Jakarta share a very cordial relationship with embassies in each capital and consulates in Vanimo and Jayapura. But the no-man’s land between the two countries remains the same 1,600km stretch of hostile virgin jungle. There is no indication as to where the border mark is except cement markers planted every 75km or so in the jungle.

In thick jungle, most of these markers are overgrown with bushes and are no longer visible. OPM freedom fighters still carry out their daring hit and run war against members of the Indonesian armed forces up and down this unmarked, jungle-covered border.

Uniformed Indonesian soldiers continue to cross the border in hot pursuit and often mistake Papua New Guinean citizens for West Papuan OPM activists as happened last month in a border village called Skotso in Sandaun province.

Amid all this, the PNG Government sits hapless, almost disinterested and even if it were interested, it is apparently helpless. To this, PNG must now face two new realities which might in time become threats if they are not already so. All along this border, the Indonesian government seems to have a decided policy to build infrastructure and improve government services to the area.

This is forcing Papua New Guinean citizens, who naturally have relations across the border, to cross into Indonesian towns looking for jobs, for medical treatment and in search of education. The boy who was shot last month was actually attending school in Indonesia and was returning home to Skotso when the shooting incident happened.

Despite the incident, relatives ferried the boy back across the border to get medical treatment in Jayapura, reinforcing the idea that whatever the threat, PNG’s border people seek services on the other side. The second problem that appears to be happening is illegal border crossers. Forest Minister Belden Namah said last week that Asians were crossing illegally into PNG.“They do not need to come in containers any more.

They just breathe fresh air and cross the border into PNG in broad daylight,” Mr Namah said.The Papua New Guinea response to this is next to nothing.There is nil development of any kind all along the PNG side of the border.

The PNG Defence Force detachment and police border commands in both Western and Sandaun lack vehicular support, communications and other logistics. The Sandaun police are understaffed by half their required ceiling and have withdrawn all personal from little sub-districts all along the border from Amanab and Green River to Telefomin.

“It is a very difficult situation when you call and call and it falls on deaf ears,” Mr Namah said in relation to his attempts to get the Government to improve border security and surveillance and to increase funding for infrastructure and economic projects along the border. The new Border Development Authority ought to be authorised to use its funds to increase surveillance and to establish agro-forestry projects in Sandaun and Western provinces.

Piak is a student of the Divine Word University in Madang, Papua New Guinea*

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Border issues are crucial to Papua New Guinea

BY GELAB PIAK*

The Papua New Guinea-Indonesia border has always been a contentious issue between the two countries. There was a time in the 1970s and early 1980s when suspicion was so high on both sides that there was a very real fear in PNG of high levels of invasion by Indonesian Forces across the border.

The PNG Defence Force drilled in jungle warfare tactics, mostly to hold off the superior numbers of Indonesian troops in the jungles of PNG. At the time the West Papua freedom fighters, the OPM, took advantage of the suspicion and mistrust between the two countries to carry out its rebel activities into PNG territory, further driving a wedge between the two neighbours.

West Papuans crossed as refugees into PNG in droves, heightening diplomatic and security tensions.Then in 1987, at the instigation of PNG, the two countries signed the Treaty of Mutual Friendship, Goodwill and Respect. Cross-border dialogue improved and increased in frequency.

Today, Waigani and Jakarta share a very cordial relationship with embassies in each capital and consulates in Vanimo and Jayapura. But the no-man’s land between the two countries remains the same 1,600km stretch of hostile virgin jungle. There is no indication as to where the border mark is except cement markers planted every 75km or so in the jungle.

In thick jungle, most of these markers are overgrown with bushes and are no longer visible. OPM freedom fighters still carry out their daring hit and run war against members of the Indonesian armed forces up and down this unmarked, jungle-covered border.

Uniformed Indonesian soldiers continue to cross the border in hot pursuit and often mistake Papua New Guinean citizens for West Papuan OPM activists as happened last month in a border village called Skotso in Sandaun province.

Amid all this, the PNG Government sits hapless, almost disinterested and even if it were interested, it is apparently helpless. To this, PNG must now face two new realities which might in time become threats if they are not already so. All along this border, the Indonesian government seems to have a decided policy to build infrastructure and improve government services to the area.

This is forcing Papua New Guinean citizens, who naturally have relations across the border, to cross into Indonesian towns looking for jobs, for medical treatment and in search of education. The boy who was shot last month was actually attending school in Indonesia and was returning home to Skotso when the shooting incident happened.

Despite the incident, relatives ferried the boy back across the border to get medical treatment in Jayapura, reinforcing the idea that whatever the threat, PNG’s border people seek services on the other side. The second problem that appears to be happening is illegal border crossers. Forest Minister Belden Namah said last week that Asians were crossing illegally into PNG.“They do not need to come in containers any more.

They just breathe fresh air and cross the border into PNG in broad daylight,” Mr Namah said.The Papua New Guinea response to this is next to nothing.There is nil development of any kind all along the PNG side of the border.

The PNG Defence Force detachment and police border commands in both Western and Sandaun lack vehicular support, communications and other logistics. The Sandaun police are understaffed by half their required ceiling and have withdrawn all personal from little sub-districts all along the border from Amanab and Green River to Telefomin.

“It is a very difficult situation when you call and call and it falls on deaf ears,” Mr Namah said in relation to his attempts to get the Government to improve border security and surveillance and to increase funding for infrastructure and economic projects along the border. The new Border Development Authority ought to be authorised to use its funds to increase surveillance and to establish agro-forestry projects in Sandaun and Western provinces.

Piak is a student of the Divine Word University in Madang, Papua New Guinea*

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Enlightened self-interest - Is it common in Papua New Guinea?

Self -interest may work far well in other countries but in Papua New Guinea, it's adding a lot of burden to the people of this biggest nation in the Pacific. When people in leadership positions who were bestowed with power and swore to serve the people keep their roots deep in serving themselves, we have a huge problem on our hands. This is pure selfishness!

Selfishness denotes the precedence given in thought or deed to the self, i.e., self interest or self concern. It is the act of placing one's own needs or desires above the needs or desires of others. Selfishness is the opposite of altruism (selflessness).

Sani Rambi, for example; the member for Mul/Baiyer Open and National Security Minister who owns the Mountain Hire Cars have the government hire his cars for police operations. What kind of deal is that? Is it a conflict of interest situation in here? Who's interest is the good MP serving? Why let other Papua New Guineans have the contract with the police?

Enlightened self-interest is a philosophy in ethics which states that persons who act to further the interests of others (or the interests of the group or groups to which they belong), ultimately serve their own self-interest. How many Speiks hold higher positions in the government? How many Papuans holding the same positions? How many people are selected on merit? Did they apply through the proper application process? Is there a balance between people representing the four regions of Papua New Guinea? I doubt it!

As we speak, all of these people act according to their own myopic selfishness, that we suffer loss as a result of conflict, decreased efficiency because of lack of cooperation, and the increased expenses each of us pay for the protection of our own interests. When a typical individual in such a group is selected at random, it is not likely that this person will profit from such a group ethic.

Some of these individuals and public figures might profit, in a material sense, from a philosophy of greed, but we believe that by proponents of enlightened self-interest that these individuals constitute a small minority and that the large majority of Papua New Guineans living in the villages can expect to experience a net personal loss from a philosophy of simple unenlightened selfishness.

Ultimately, it is our wish and from the bottom of the heart of the voiceless that individuals, groups, or even commercial entities will "do well by doing good" and write a new chapter for Papua New Guinea. When you put others interests first behind yours, you not only change the cause of Papua New Guinea but leave lasting memories and your legacy will linger in the hearts and minds of ordinary Papua New Guineans.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Enlightened self-interest - Is it common in Papua New Guinea?

Self -interest may work far well in other countries but in Papua New Guinea, it's adding a lot of burden to the people of this biggest nation in the Pacific. When people in leadership positions who were bestowed with power and swore to serve the people keep their roots deep in serving themselves, we have a huge problem on our hands. This is pure selfishness!

Selfishness denotes the precedence given in thought or deed to the self, i.e., self interest or self concern. It is the act of placing one's own needs or desires above the needs or desires of others. Selfishness is the opposite of altruism (selflessness).

Sani Rambi, for example; the member for Mul/Baiyer Open and National Security Minister who owns the Mountain Hire Cars have the government hire his cars for police operations. What kind of deal is that? Is it a conflict of interest situation in here? Who's interest is the good MP serving? Why let other Papua New Guineans have the contract with the police?

Enlightened self-interest is a philosophy in ethics which states that persons who act to further the interests of others (or the interests of the group or groups to which they belong), ultimately serve their own self-interest. How many Speiks hold higher positions in the government? How many Papuans holding the same positions? How many people are selected on merit? Did they apply through the proper application process? Is there a balance between people representing the four regions of Papua New Guinea? I doubt it!

As we speak, all of these people act according to their own myopic selfishness, that we suffer loss as a result of conflict, decreased efficiency because of lack of cooperation, and the increased expenses each of us pay for the protection of our own interests. When a typical individual in such a group is selected at random, it is not likely that this person will profit from such a group ethic.

Some of these individuals and public figures might profit, in a material sense, from a philosophy of greed, but we believe that by proponents of enlightened self-interest that these individuals constitute a small minority and that the large majority of Papua New Guineans living in the villages can expect to experience a net personal loss from a philosophy of simple unenlightened selfishness.

Ultimately, it is our wish and from the bottom of the heart of the voiceless that individuals, groups, or even commercial entities will "do well by doing good" and write a new chapter for Papua New Guinea. When you put others interests first behind yours, you not only change the cause of Papua New Guinea but leave lasting memories and your legacy will linger in the hearts and minds of ordinary Papua New Guineans.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Enlightened self-interest - Is it common in Papua New Guinea?

Self -interest may work far well in other countries but in Papua New Guinea, it's adding a lot of burden to the people of this biggest nation in the Pacific. When people in leadership positions who were bestowed with power and swore to serve the people keep their roots deep in serving themselves, we have a huge problem on our hands. This is pure selfishness!

Selfishness denotes the precedence given in thought or deed to the self, i.e., self interest or self concern. It is the act of placing one's own needs or desires above the needs or desires of others. Selfishness is the opposite of altruism (selflessness).

Sani Rambi, for example; the member for Mul/Baiyer Open and National Security Minister who owns the Mountain Hire Cars have the government hire his cars for police operations. What kind of deal is that? Is it a conflict of interest situation in here? Who's interest is the good MP serving? Why let other Papua New Guineans have the contract with the police?

Enlightened self-interest is a philosophy in ethics which states that persons who act to further the interests of others (or the interests of the group or groups to which they belong), ultimately serve their own self-interest. How many Speiks hold higher positions in the government? How many Papuans holding the same positions? How many people are selected on merit? Did they apply through the proper application process? Is there a balance between people representing the four regions of Papua New Guinea? I doubt it!

As we speak, all of these people act according to their own myopic selfishness, that we suffer loss as a result of conflict, decreased efficiency because of lack of cooperation, and the increased expenses each of us pay for the protection of our own interests. When a typical individual in such a group is selected at random, it is not likely that this person will profit from such a group ethic.

Some of these individuals and public figures might profit, in a material sense, from a philosophy of greed, but we believe that by proponents of enlightened self-interest that these individuals constitute a small minority and that the large majority of Papua New Guineans living in the villages can expect to experience a net personal loss from a philosophy of simple unenlightened selfishness.

Ultimately, it is our wish and from the bottom of the heart of the voiceless that individuals, groups, or even commercial entities will "do well by doing good" and write a new chapter for Papua New Guinea. When you put others interests first behind yours, you not only change the cause of Papua New Guinea but leave lasting memories and your legacy will linger in the hearts and minds of ordinary Papua New Guineans.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@